Actually, I explained why this would happen BACK IN MAY of 2007. No kidding! So, to adequately explain why Edwards is (depending on the poll) either in first place or firmly in second place for the Hawkeye Cauci, I am reposting my Myspace blog entry titled "MAYBE EDWARDS CAN SUE THE TERRORISTS".
Maybe Edwards Can SUE the Terrorists
by Sean Plankey May 2007
As I caught part of the sophistry at last night's collection of intellectual nitwits, (i.e. the Democrat presidential debate) it suddenly dawned on me who will emerge as the Democrat presidential nominee. Believe me, this Dem election is a choice between dumb, dumber and dumbest but I think there is one individual who will rise to the top and the explanation is quite simple.
John Edwards will be the Democrat nominee for president, despite what you read about in EARLY polling. This "slip and fall" lawsuit happy lawyer has the kind of "forked tongue" that will be music to the ears of Democrat voters, the majority of whom are hopelessly ignorant about political issues. Many of these fools aren't even paying attention yet, they're too busy watching re-runs of "The Simpsons", "American Idol" or "The View"!
It is not that Edwards provides any kind of inspiration or vision that is normally required of a leader. Unsophisticated Democrat voters never asked for it from Bill Clinton, Al Gore or John Kerry. Why would they start now? Rather, Democrat voters typically seek a handsome candidate with a nice smile who LOOKS presidential. Add to that a penchant for smooth talking that could rival any used car salesman and you arrive at the perfect candidate. Remember the way Mister Perjury could twist a reporter's question in such a way as to make the question look stupid and embarrass the reporter? Well my suspicion is that Edwards, a fellow lawyer and slicker than whale snot, can perform in the same deceptive fashion!
Additionally, without questioning the veracity of my wrists, I can admit to the obvious. That Edwards is "easy on the eyes" with a hairstyle, so carefully coiffed that it makes his wife the envy of American women from coast to coast! Studies have proven that women vote for the attractive candidate who makes them feel safe, comfortable and even loved! Now, how in the heck would Hillary Clinton ever achieve that?
Speaking of "Shrill-ary", she's an empty suit who couldn't articulate her way out of a paper bag. When she attempts to make a valid argument, it sounds as if fingernails are being dragged across a chalkboard. EEEEK! I can almost hear it now, can't you? During the debate last night, she sounded monotone and robotic, as if every answer was rehearsed with her "handlers". When a scenario didn't fit what her preparations could handle, she coyly answered "I'm not going to get into any hypotheticals tonight." Say what Hill? Being the president is all about hypotheticals, particularly in the post-9/11 world! For her to not be able to discuss them is further proof of her lack of qualification to be president.
"Osama" Obama isn't really much better. His lack of qualfications manifest themselves each time he opens his mouth and utters the same old, hackneyed rhetoric that has been used by Democrat presidential candidates throughout time. No vision on keeping America safe, no new ideas on how to make government more efficient, no leadership on restoring American values to our culture and nothing that INSPIRES voters to vote FOR him. Just divisive comments that utilize populist rhetoric with one objective in mind: to divide America on a racial, ethnic and especially income basis. Dividing Americans is an age old tactic of those whose allegiances are with socialistic thought because it makes government much more powerful. A more powerful govenment naturally gives more power to those in positions of authority, its just common sense folks. The truth about Obama is so similar to the truth about Hillary. THEY ARE BOTH EMPTY SUITS WITH NO REAL EXPERIENCE BUT THEY CAN'T HIDE IT! All they can do is smile for the camera, try their best to look presidential and say the right things when the dunderheads are paying attention.
So, unless another candidate jumps in (hello Al Gore, the Tennessee Two by Four), Edwards will win the nomination by default. Why, you may ask? Edwards, as a one term senator from NC who couldn't win re-election, is just as unprepared to serve as commander-in-chief as the other two idiots but there is one critical difference. EDWARDS IS SLICK ENOUGH TO HIDE IT!! From the first moment I laid eyes on John Edwards in 2003, he scared the living "dog-squeeze" out of me for one singular reason: he reminded me of Bill Clinton to a tee! The guy has the skills to deceive and with the right team of "spin-meisters", he can woo the dunderheads right out from under Hillary and Osama Obama's political tent. Perhaps you doubt my logic here, well let me ask you a question. While working as a trial lawyer, how did Edwards win one multi-million dollar settlement after another with apparent ease? The answer is that he was able to persuade jurors who are only marginally smarter than Democrat voters. If he was able to pull it off so many times in the past, what's to stop him from pulling it off one more time?